The 3-2-1 Reading Comprehension Strategy: Students’ Reading Comprehension Development and Students’ Perception
The 3-2-1 reading comprehension strategy is a new strategy and the study on the strategy is still rare at least in 2019. This strategy presents in the right time when the teacher needs to apply new strategy in the reading classroom. This research was conducted as an attempt to improve the students’ reading comprehension. Designed as a non-observation classroom action research, this research involved 36 students in a junior high school. There were two tests administered in the classroom, the pre-intervention and the post-intervention test. The intervention is conducted by doing three sessions of reading comprehension practice with the 3-2-1 strategy. The comparison of means between the tests by using paired sample t-test showed that there is a significant difference between the means where the post-intervention test mean is significantly higher than the pre-intervention test mean. This implies that the 3-2-1 reading comprehension strategy can be a good consideration for reading teachers. The students mentioned that this strategy has positive impacts on their reading practice and result. However, it is also captured that this strategy is only suitable for reading short text. This opens opportunity to the next researchers to conduct research on the use of 3-2-1 reading comprehension strategy on reading longer text.
Beno, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of Using Short Story to Improve Students’ Vocabulary Mastery. LANGUA: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 2(2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3542295
Bouchard, M. (2005). Comprehension Strategies for English Language Learners. Scholastic Inc.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. Routledge.
Elliott, R. (1990). Encouraging reader-response to literature in ESL situations. ELT Journal, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 191-198.
Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills. Cambridge University Press.
Harrison, C. (2004). Understanding Reading Development. Sage Publication.
Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a Lingua Franca: Interpretation and Attitudes. World Englishes, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 200-207.
Kheirzadeh, S. & Tavakoli, E. (2012). The Cause of Reading Difficulty: The Perception of Iranian EFL Post-graduate and Under-graduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 147-152.
Lao, C. Y., & Krashen, S. (2000). The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: More evidence for the power of reading. System, Vol. 28, pp. 261-270.
Lauder, A. (2008). The Status and Function of English in Indonesia: A Review of Key Factors. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 9-20.
McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2005). Reading Comprehension Strategies: Theories, Interventions, and Technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Murdoch, G. (2002). Exploiting well-known short stories for language skills development. IATEFL LCS SIG Newsletter 23, p. 9-17.
Nation, K. (2019). Children’s Reading Difficulties, Language, and Reflections on the Simple View of Reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 47-73.
Norton, S. L. (2009). Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge.
Udin, M. (2018). Reading Comprehension: A Study on the Correlation between Grammar and Logic. LANGUA: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 1(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1415299
Yaseen, A. (2013). The Reading Difficulties in English and How to Deal with them as Perceived by Teachers and Students in Nablus District. Unpublished Thesis in the Faculty of Graduate Studies, An-Najah National University.
Zigouris-Coe, V., Wiggins, M. B., & Smith, L. H. (2005). Engaging Student with Text: the 3-2-1 Strategy. The Reading Teacher, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 381-384.
Copyright (c) 2020 Z Zainurrahman, Sriyani Djabir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Langua Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in Langua.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Langua.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.